Blue-Green Algae Pose Toxic Risks In Shrimp, Fish CultureMonday, September 03, 2012
The toxins from blue-green algae pose a threat to animal health and potentially to consumers if they are present in farmed product. Culture animals that ingest these toxins may not die, but can be weakened, increasing their susceptibility to pathogens. Killing algae outright can be problematic, so it makes sense to proactively manage their presence by managing production systems to ensure a proper balance of nutrients, writes Stephen G. Newman. Taken from the Global Aquaculture Advocate, a Global Aquaculture Alliance publication.
Widespread pollution of the oceans is
a serious problem, and all indications are
that dead zones – a direct result of excess
nutrients promoting the growth of algae
that in turn utilize all of the oxygen present
in an area – are increasing in occurrence.
As of 2011, more than 500 of
these zones had been identified.
It is highly likely that many more areas are in decline due to pollution. The constant addition of nutrients from billions of tons of untreated human sewage, agricultural run-off and industrial waste are slowly strangling the ability of the oceans to cope. The intensification of aquaculture systems in Southeast Asia may also contribute.
Blue-green algae (cyanophytes or cyanobacteria)
sit on the phylogenetic fence
between being bacteria and algae, with an
ongoing tug of war among taxonomists as
to which group they belong. They are
accurately characterized as photosynthetic
Blue-green algae are widely viewed as indicators of pollution, and their presence in aquaculture production systems at high numbers is a sign that the systems are not being properly managed. When influent comes from areas that are in preliminary “dead zone” stages, heavy nutrient loads and undesirable algal species can be pumped into production areas.
Perhaps the single greatest threat
from these algae is the toxins they produce.
Many toxins have been characterized,
including neurotoxins, hepatotoxins,
cytotoxins and dermatotoxins. Some are
widely documented, such as the micromicrocystins
and nodularin that can cause liver
damage, geosmin responsible for off-flavor,
(BMAA), a potent toxin produced by
many species that has been linked to several
serious brain diseases, including amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis (ALS) and
While many strains are benign, many strains are not. They pose a serious threat to animal health and potentially to consumers if they are present in farmed product. No regulations require screening for some of the more potent toxins. It is highly probable that they are present to some extent in some animals.
A number of algae species have been implicated in fish kills and, to a lesser extent, shrimp die-offs. Bearing in mind that they are ubiquitous and that shrimp are routinely farmed in waters that contain blue-greens, it is likely their presence is impacting productivity. Animals that ingest these toxins may not die, but can be weakened, increasing their susceptibility to pathogens. The presence of algae can also impact growth rates and feedconversion ratios.
Impacts On Shrimp Farming
Recent reports from Southeast Asia
suggest a number of potential toxins at
work in many different countries might
be killing shrimp during the first days
after stocking. The pathology is consistent
with that of a hepatotoxin, and several
studies have implicated a role of benthic
materials in this process.
It is a common practice to kill incoming algae, zooplankton and other planktonic organisms by the use of chlorine. This is primarily done to lessen the risk of introducing viral vectors into the ponds. Many blue-greens release toxins upon death and settle to the bottom as they die off. Postlarval shrimp feeding on the benthos are exposed to these toxins. A number of the toxins are biodegraded by the action of natural bacteria in the ponds and typically no longer cause biological impacts. Some, however, persist and impact animals directly and indirectly.
It is critical for both short-term production and long-term culture success that the presence of these algae as well as their environmental loads are kept to a minimum. While low-level mortality and gradual attrition in the culture environment are likely results of the presence of these toxins, they pale against the potential risks to consumers of farmed products containing toxic material.
There are a number of potential solutions
to algae problems, and it is always
in the best interests of farmers to minimize
the presence of blue-green algae in
their production systems. Killing them
outright can be problematic, however. It
makes much more sense to proactively
manage their presence by managing production
systems to ensure a proper balance
Discharging waste products from intensive culture systems is a poor practice. Best practices dictate that these wastes be collected and digested using the same technologies that are currently used to degrade sewage.
The risks due to algae are real and need to be proactively managed. Enzymelinked immunosorbent assay-based tools allow suspect animal tissues to be tested for the presence of potentially harmful toxins. Many of these toxins are readily metabolized, although in some cases, their presence even at very low levels can stress animals and lead to both production and potential consumer problems.